Flame retardant polypropylene resin composition

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides a polypropylene resin composition including a polypropylene resin having a melt flow rate of 4-18 g/10 minutes, a flame retardant additive having a low melting point, an antimony oxide, a UV stabilizer, a silane coupling agent, and titanium dioxide as a light-blocking agent. The resin composition of the invention produces products exhibiting excellent flame retarding properties, stability against weather, and maintainability of physical/mechanical properties as shown by maintaining the original flame retarding properties after long periods of outdoor exposure and hydrothermal dipping treatments.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates to a flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition having polypropylene resin as a main component, and more particularly, to a polypropylene resin composition which includes a polypropylene resin with a melt flow rate of 4-18 g/10 minutes, a halogen-containing flame retardant additive with a low melting point, an antimony oxide, an ultraviolet stabilizer, a silane coupling agent, and titanium dioxide used as a light-blocking agent. The resin composition exhibits good weathering properties and maintains the same level of flame retardancy as well as other physical/mechanical property characteristics after a hydrothermal dipping treatment.

[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art

[0004] Polypropylene resins are used extensively in home electronic appliances, building members, interior decorating materials, and automobile parts due to their excellent processing characteristics, chemical resistance, and mechanical strength. These resins, however, lack flame retardancy and are therefore difficult to use in the manufacture of automobile parts or electronic components which require protection against the danger of fire. As a result, the effects of the addition of various organic, inorganic, and phosphorus flame retardant additives on flame retardancy in polyolefin resins have been studied extensively.

[0005] Japanese Patent Publication Nos. 53-92855, 54-29350, 54-77658, 56-26954, 57-87462, and 60-110738 disclose preparation methods of producing flame retardant polypropylene resin compositions by adding inorganic flame retardant additives such as magnesium hydroxide, aluminum hydroxide, or hydrotalcite. However, in order to obtain a flame retardant grade of V-0, a resin composition including more than 50% by weight of the inorganic filler is needed. This high level of inorganic filler results in a deterioration of the processability of the resin, generation of gas during processing, and a decrease in impact strength of the resin product.

[0006] Japanese Patent Publication No. 53-30739 discloses flame retardant polypropylene resin compositions produced by adding organic halogen-containing flame retardant additives such as decabromodiphenylether and dodecachloro-dodecahydromethanodibenzocyclooctane. Other flame retardant polypropylene resin compositions are produced by adding tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether), bis-(tribromophenoxyethyl)tetrabromobisphenol A ether, hexabromo cyclododecane, and tetrabromobisphenol A. Although these resin compositions exhibit excellent flame retardancy and processability, weatherability and resistance to hot water are poor making it difficult to use the resin in outdoor products such as light bulb sockets for Christmas tree lights.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0007] The object of the invention is to solve the problems described above and to provide a flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition that exhibits good flame retardancy for thin-walled structures, produces products that maintain good flame retardancy even after long outdoor exposure times or hydrothermal dipping treatments, and exhibit good weather resistance while maintaining the mechanical properties of the resin.

[0008] The flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention includes about 40-90% by weight polypropylene resin with a melt flow rate of about 4-18 g/10 minutes, about 9-16% by weight halogen-containing flame retardant additive with a low melt point, about 4-15% by weight antimony oxide in the form of white granules, about 0.2-3.0% by weight ultraviolet stabilizer, about 0.1-5% by weight silane coupling agent, and about 0.2-5% by weight titanium dioxide.

[0009] In the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, the polypropylene resin may be a crystalline polypropylene homopolymer or a polypropylene copolymer of propylene with comonomers including ethylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 4-methylpentene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-decene, or mixtures thereof. The preferred polypropylene resin is a crystalline polypropylene homopolymer. The melt flow rate of the polypropylene resin may be about 4-18 g/10 minutes, or more preferably about 5-15 g/10 minutes. The amount of polypropylene resin in the overall resin composition may be 40-86% by weight, or more preferably, 50-86% by weight.

[0010] In the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, the halogen-containing flame retardant additive with a low melt point may be tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether), tetrabromo dimethylsulfone dipropylether, or mixtures thereof. Examples of commercially available products include PE-68 (manufactured by Great Lakes Corporation) and P680G (manufactured by Suzuhiro Chemicals, Co.). A preferred amount of tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) or tetrabromodimethylsulfone dipropylether in the resin composition is about 9-16% by weight based on the overall weight of the resin composition. When the amount of flame retardant additive is below about 9% by weight, a flame retardancy grade of V-0 cannot be obtained for a film thickness of {fraction (1/32)} inch. When the amount of flame retardant additive is above about 16% by weight, weather resistance is reduced making it difficult to maintain the mechanical properties of the resin.

[0011] The silane coupling agent in the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention may be represented by the following general formula:

RR′SiX₂

[0012] where R is a hydrocarbon including vinyl, chloro, amino, and mercapto; X is an organic group that can be hydrolyzed; and R′ may be R or X. Examples of the silane coupling agent include vinyl trimethoxy silane, vinyl triethoxy silane, 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane, N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, 3-glycydoxypropyl trimethoxy silane, 3-chloropropyl trimethoxy silane, 3-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane, and 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxy silane. To improve dispersive strength and adhesive strength when using antimony trioxide and halogen-containing flame retardant additives, preferred silane coupling agents include vinyl trimethoxy silane, vinyl triethoxy silane, and 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxy silane.

[0013] The amount of silane coupling agent used in the resin composition may be about 0.1-5% by weight, preferably about 0.15-3% by weight, and more preferably about 0.3-1% by weight based on the weight of the overall resin composition. When the amount of silane coupling agent in the resin composition is below about 0.1% by weight, the dispersive strength and adhesive strength of the resin are not improved with the use of antimony trioxide or halogen-containing flame retardant additives. In addition, blooming of the flame retardant additive during dipping in a hydrothermal test cannot be prevented making it difficult to maintain a flame retardancy grade of V-0 for a film thickness of {fraction (1/32)} inch. When the silane coupling agent amount is increased to levels of above about 5% by weight, there is no further improvement in the prevention of blooming of the flame retardant additive.

[0014] In the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, it is preferable to use UV absorbents and HALS stabilizers simultaneously as ultraviolet stabilizers. The preferred HALS stabilizer has a molecular weight of more than about 2,000. If the molecular weight of the HALS stabilizer is below about 2,000, ultraviolet stabilizers easily bloom out of the secondary product making it difficult to maintain long-term ultraviolet stability. The UV absorbent and HALS ultraviolet stabilizer are preferably used in the resin composition in amounts of about 0.1-1.5% by weight each. If the UV absorbent or HALS ultraviolet stabilizer is used alone in the resin composition, a flame retardancy grade of V-0 may be obtained; however, it may be difficult to produce a resin composition which meets the F1 standard for tensile impact strength after UV exposure treatment.

[0015] In the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, titanium dioxide is used as a light-blocking agent in order to obtain a grade of F1 for environmental resistance. The preferred amount of titanium dioxide is about 0.2-5% by weight. If the amount of titanium dioxide in the resin composition is below about 0.2% by weight, synergistic effects with the ultraviolet stabilizer are absent. Above amounts of about 5% by weight, there is no further improvement in light blocking ability.

[0016] In the flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, antimony trioxide, antimony pentaoxide, or mixtures thereof may be used as the antimony oxide component. The antimony oxide may used in an amount of about 4-15% by weight and preferably about 5-12% by weight based on the weight of the overall resin composition.

[0017] The flame-retardant polypropylene resin composition of the present invention exhibits excellent flame retardancy providing a grade of V-0 for a film thickness of {fraction (1/32)} inch in the vertical burning test (hereinafter referred to as “UL 94 vertical burning test”) carried out as described in “Flammability Test of Plastic Materials for Parts of Mechanical device” of UL Subject 94. In addition, the resin composition not only maintains its mechanical properties but maintains the same grade of flame retardancy after long outdoor exposure times and hydrothermal dipping treatments as indicated by weathering and water resistance testing (hereinafter referred to as “UL 746C weather proof test”) carried out as described in “Test for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Electric Device” of UL subject 746C. Therefore, the resin composition of the present invention can be used in the production of electric appliances, building members, interior or exterior decorating materials, and automotive parts.

[0018] The present invention will be further described in detail with reference to the examples and comparative examples as described below. The examples, however, are for the purpose of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS EXAMPLE 1

[0019] The following components were added into a Hensel mixer and mixed by stirring for 3 minutes: 7.9 kg crystalline polypropylene homopolymer with a melt flow rate of 8 g/10 minutes as the polypropylene resin component, 1.4 kg tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) (PE-68 produced by Great Lakes Corporation), 700 g antimony trioxide (Sb203 produced by Cheil Flame Retardant, Ltd., 1.2 μm), and as additives, 10 g calcium stearate, 10 g antioxidant (1010 Produced by CIBA GEIGY), 20 g IRGAFOS 168 (produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g UV absorbent (Tinuvin 326 produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g HALS ultraviolet stabilizer (Chimabsorber 944FD produced by CIBA GEIGY), 200 g light-blocking agent TiO₂ (R-103 produced by Dupont, Inc.), and 70 g silane coupling agent (A-174 produced by Union carbide). The mixture was extruded at 190° C. in the form of pellets using a two-axis stirring extruder with a diameter of 30 mm. The extruded pellets were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined. Results are shown in Table 1.

[0020] Method of Treatment

[0021] The test pieces were UV treated using ASTM 2565 Type A under weathering conditions as described in “Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Electrical device” of UL 746C (Underwriter's Laboratories Incorporation) (UV irradiation quantity: 0.35 W/m² at 340 nm, black board temperature: 63° C., water spray method). The test pieces were dipped in a hydrothermal tank at a temperature of 70° C. and maintained for 7 days. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined.

[0022] Method of Evaluation

[0023] Flame retardancy was evaluated using vertical burning tests as described in “Tests for Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Mechanical device” of UL 94 (Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.). The thickness of each test piece was {fraction (1/32)} inch. The tensile impact strength and maintenance rate were evaluated using the impact strength test standard ASTM D-1822. The measuring instrument was produced by TOYOSEIKI and used an S-type sample with a thickness of {fraction (1/8)} inch.

EXAMPLE 2 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1-3

[0024] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the amount of light-blocking agent, R-103, was modified as shown in Table 1. The extruded pellets were molded using an injection-molding machine to provide test pieces for determining flame retardancy and tensile impact strength. The flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties were then determined. Results are shown in Table 1.

[0025] A comparison of the results of Examples 1-2 and the results of Comparative examples 1-3, as presented in Table 1, shows that when appropriate amounts of TiO₂ are added as a light-blocking agent, a synergistic effect with the UV absorbent and HALS ultraviolet stabilizer occurs. The synergy makes it possible to maintain a high tensile impact strength as well as a flame retardancy grade of V-0 after UV exposure. Flame retardancy and tensile impact strength, as well as weatherability, are also maintained after a hydrothermal dipping treatment providing a UL 764C grade of F1 for indoor and outdoor electrical devices.

EXAMPLES 3-4 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 4-5

[0026] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the amount of antimony trioxide used as a flame retardant additive was modified as shown in Table 1. The extruded pellets were molded using an injection-molding machine to provide test pieces for determining flame retardancy and tensile impact strength. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties were then determined. Results are shown in Table 1.

[0027] A comparison of the results of Examples 3-4 with the results of Comparative examples 4-5, as presented in Table 1, shows that the amount of flame retardant additive in the composition should be below a certain level in order to promote synergy between the flame retardant and the UV absorbent and stabilizers. The flame retardant should be maintained below a given amount in the composition in order to maintain flame retardancy after UV exposure testing and hydrothermal dipping treatments as well. When antimony trioxides are added in excess of about 17%, the physical/mechanical properties are degraded and no further synergistic effects with flame retardancy are exhibited thereby preventing a UL 764C grade of F1.

EXAMPLE 5

[0028] The following components were added into a Hensel mixer and mixed by stirring for 3 minutes: 7.9 kg crystalline polypropylene homopolymer with a melt flow rate of 4 g/10 minutes as the polypropylene resin component, 1.4 kg tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) (PE-68 produced by Great Lakes Corporation), 700 g antimony trioxide (Sb203 produced by Cheil Flame Retardant, Ltd., 1.2 μm), and as additives, 10 g calcium stearate, 10 g antioxidant (1010 Produced by CIBA GEIGY), 20 g IRGAFOS 168 (produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g UV absorbent (Tinuvin 326 produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g HALS ultraviolet stabilizer (Chimabsorber 944FD produced by CIBA GEIGY), 200 g light-blocking agent TiO₂ (R-103 produced by Dupont, Inc.), and 70 g of silane coupling agent (A-174 produced by Union carbide). The mixture was extruded at 190° C. in the form of pellets using a two-axis stirring extruder with a diameter of 30 mm. The extruded pellets were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined. The methods of treatment and evaluation were the same as described in Example 1. Results are presented in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 6 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 6-7

[0029] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the polypropylene resin was changed to a polypropylene resin with a different melt flow rate as shown in Table 1. The extruded pellets were molded using an injection-molding machine to provide test pieces for determining flame retardancy and tensile impact strength. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties were then determined. Results are shown in Table 1.

[0030] As seen in Table 1, the melt flow rate of the polypropylene resin has a large effect on the properties of the composition as shown by the results of the UV exposure testing and hydrothermal dipping treatments. If the melt flow rate of the polypropylene resin is less than about 4 g/10 minitues, the initial properties are excellent; however, after UV exposure testing, the physical/mechanical properties are degraded. If the melt flow rate is above 20 g/10 minitues, the initial flame retardancy and the flame retardancy after UV exposure testing and hydrothermal dipping treatment do not meet the requirements of the V-0 grade of flame retardancy at a film thickness of {fraction (1/32)} inch. Therefore, in order to maintain a UL 764C grade of F1, the preferred melt flow rate range for polypropylene is about 4-18 g/10 minutes.

EXAMPLE 7

[0031] The following components were added into a Hensel mixer and mixed by stirring for 3 minutes: 7.9 kg crystalline polypropylene homopolymer with a melt flow rate of 8 g/10 minutes as the polypropylene resin component, 1.4 kg tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) (PE-68 produced by Great Lakes Corporation), 700 g antimony trioxide (Sb203 produced by Cheil Flame Retardant, Ltd., 1.2 μm), and as additives, 10 g calcium stearate, 10 g antioxidant (1010 Produced by CIBA GEIGY), 20 g IRGAFOS 168 (produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g UV absorbent (Tinuvin 326 produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g HALS ultraviolet stabilizer (Chimabsorber 944FD produced by CIBA GEIGY), 200 g light-blocking agent TiO₂ (R-103 produced by Dupont, Inc.), and 15 g silane coupling agent (A-174 produced by Union carbide). The mixture was extruded at 190° C. in the form of pellets using a two-axis stirring extruder with a diameter of 30 mm. The extruded pellets were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were determined. The methods of treatment and evaluation were the same as described in Example 1. Results are shown in Table 2.

EXAMPLE 8 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 8-10

[0032] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the amount of silane coupling agent, A-174, was modified as shown in Table 2.

[0033] The pellets extruded in examples 7 and 8 were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined. Results are shown in Table 2.

[0034] As seen in Table 2, when appropriate amounts of silane coupling agent are added, the adhesiveness between the flame retardant agent and the polypropylene resin and the dispersibility of retardant agent or retardant coagent in the polypropylene resin are improved. A flame retardancy grade of V-0 is achieved and tensile strength is maintained as well. Furthermore, improved environmental resistance provides a UL 764C grade of F1. The preferred range of silane coupling agent is about 0.3-3% by weight.

EXAMPLE 9

[0035] The following components were added into a Hensel mixer and mixed by stirring for 3 minutes: 7.9 kg crystalline polypropylene homopolymer with a melt flow rate of 8 g/10 minutes as the polypropylene resin component, 1.4 kg tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) (PE-68 produced by Great Lakes Corporation), 700 g antimony trioxide (Sb203 produced by Cheil Flame Retardant, Ltd., 1.2 μm), and as additives, 10 g calcium stearate, 10 g antioxidant (1010 Produced by CIBA GEIGY), 20 g IRGAFOS 168 (produced by CIBA GEIGY), 70 g UV absorbent (Tinuvin 326 produced by CIBA GEIGY), 70 g HALS ultraviolet stabilizer (Chimabsorber 944FD produced by CIBA GEIGY), 200 g light-blocking agent TiO₂ (R-103 produced by Dupont, Inc.), and 70 g silane coupling agent (A-174 produced by Union carbide). The mixture was extruded at 190° C. in the form of pellets using a two-axis stirring extruder with a diameter of 30 mm. The extruded pellets were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined. The methods of treatment and evaluation were the same as described in Example 1. Results are shown in Table 2.

EXAMPLE 10 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 11-16

[0036] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the amounts of UV absorbent and HALS ultraviolet stabilizer in the composition were modified as shown in Table 2. The extruded pellets were molded using an injection-molding machine to provide test pieces for flame retardancy testing and tensile impact strength testing. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties were then determined Results are shown in Table 2.

[0037] As seen in Table 2, using a mixture of UV absorbent and HALS ultraviolet stabilizer in the appropriate amounts provides improved flame retardancy and environmental resistance.

EXAMPLE 11

[0038] The following components were added into a Hensel mixer and mixed by stirring for 3 minutes: 8.1 kg crystalline polypropylene homopolymer with a melt flow rate of 8 g/10 minutes as the polypropylene resin component, 1.3 kg tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) (PE-68 produced by Great Lakes Corporation), 650 g antimony trioxide (Sb203 produced by Cheil Flame Retardant, Ltd., 1.2 μm), and as additives, 10 g calcium stearate, 10 g antioxidant (1010 Produced by CIBA GEIGY), 20 g IRGAFOS 168 (produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g UV absorbent (Tinuvin 326 produced by CIBA GEIGY), 30 g HALS ultraviolet stabilizer (Chimabsorber 944FD produced by CIBA GEIGY), 200 g light-blocking agent TiO₂ (R-103 produced by Dupont, Inc.), and 70 g silane coupling agent (A-174 produced by Union carbide). The mixture was extruded at 190° C. in the form of pellets using a two-axis stirring extruder with a diameter of 30 mm. The extruded pellets were dried for three hours at 100° C. Flame retardancy test pieces were formed using an injection-molding machine with a maximum cylinder temperature fixed at 200° C. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties of the test pieces were then determined. The methods of treatment and evaluation were the same as described in Example 1. Results are shown in Table 2.

EXAMPLE 12 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 17-18

[0039] The pellets were prepared in the same way as described in Example 1 except that the amounts of flame retardant agent PE-68 (tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether)) and flame retardant coagent Sb 203 (antimony trioxide) in the composition were modified as shown in Table 2. The extruded pellets were molded using an injection-molding machine to provide test pieces for flame retardancy testing and tensile impact strength testing. Flame retardancy and physical/mechanical properties were then measured. Results are shown in Table 2.

[0040] As seen in Table 2, using a mixture of flame retardant agent and coagent in specific amounts improves flame retardancy and environmental resistance. TABLE 1 1,000 hours after Exposing to UV Before Treatment Mainte- Mainte- Flame Tensile Flame Tensile nance nance Composition Component (100 g) retardancy impact retardancy impact of of A B C D E F G (1/32″) strength (1/32″) strength FR TIS(%) E1 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 38.5 V0 35.6  M* 92 E2 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 5.00 0.70 V0 39.0 V0 34.1 M 87 CE1 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.70 V0 38.9 V0 26.3 M 68 CE2 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 7.00 0.70 V0 39.4 V0 27.5 M 70 CE3 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.70 V0 36.0 V2 20.1  D* 56 E3 76 14 10 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 38.2 V0 35.4 M 93 E4 71 14 15 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 37.1 V0 34.1 M 92 CE4 69 14 17 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 39.6 V0 27.5 M 69 CE5 83 14 3 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 38.3 V2 36.4  B* 95 E5 (A1)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 39.5 V0 36.3 M 92 E6 (A2)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 35.4 V0 34.1 M 96 CE6 (A3)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 44.5 V0 30.4 M 68 CE7 (A4)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 32.1 V2 30.4 M 95 168 hours (7 days) after hydrothermal dipping Mainte- Mainte- Flame Tensile nance nance Composition Component (100 g) retardancy impact of of Final A B C D E F G (1/32″) strength FR TIS(%) Grade E1 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 42.6 M 111 F1 E2 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 5.00 0.70 V0 39.4 M 101 F1 CE1 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.70 V2 39.4 D 101  NG* CE2 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 7.00 0.70 V0 36.9 M 94 F1 CE3 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.70 V2 42.0 D 117 NG E3 76 14 10 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 41.0 M 107 F1 E4 71 14 15 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 38.3 M 103 F1 CE4 69 14 17 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 37.6 M 95 F2 CE5 83 14 3 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 38.4 B 100 NG E5 (A1)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 42.6 M 108 F1 E6 (A2)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 42.6 M 120 F1 CE6 (A3)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 42.6 M 96 F2 CE7 (A4)79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 32.6 M 102 NG

[0041] TABLE 2 1,000 hours after Exposing to UV Before Treatment Mainte- Mainte- Flame Tensile Flame Tensile nance nance Composition Component (100 g) retardancy impact retardancy impact of of A B C D E F G (1/32″) strength (1/32″) strength FR TIS (%) E7 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.15 V0 35.1 V0 28.7 M 82 E8 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 3.00 V0 32.6 V0 26.4 M 81 CE8 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 5.00 V0 34.2 V0 25.9 M 76 CE9 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.00 V0 40.2 V0 22.4 M 56 CE10 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.05 V0 37.1 V0 27.5 M 74 E9 79 14 7 0.70 0.70 2.00 0.70 V0 37.0 V0 32.6 M 88 E10 79 14 7 1.50 1.50 2.00 0.70 V0 38.4 V0 30.8 M 80 CE11 79 14 7 0.05 0.05 2.00 0.70 V0 37.4 V0 21.0 M 56 CE12 79 14 7 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.70 V2 32.4 V2 28.2 B 87 CE13 79 14 7 0.00 0.70 2.00 0.70 V0 35.4 V0 17.3 M 49 CE14 79 14 7 0.00 1.50 2.00 0.70 V0 33.5 V0 18.0 M 54 CE15 79 14 7 0.70 0.00 2.00 0.70 V0 36.2 V0 20.3 M 56 CE16 79 14 7 1.50 0.00 2.00 0.70 V0 35.7 V0 22.3 M 62 E11 81 13 6.5 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 38.9 V0 31.2 M 80 E12 76 16 8 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 32.5 V0 22.6 M 70 CE17 73 18 9 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 31.4 V2 15.9 B 51 CE18 89 7 4 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 42.3 V2 37.5 B 89 168 hours(7 days) after hydrothermal dipping Mainte- Mainte- Flame Tensile nance nance Composition Component (100 g) retardancy impact of of Final A B C D E F G (1/32″) strength FR TIS (%) Grade E7 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.15 V0 35.2 M 100 F1 E8 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 3.00 V0 38.6 M 118 F1 CE8 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 5.00 V2 33.6 D 98 NG CE9 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.00 V2 38.4 D 96 NG CE10 79 14 7 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.05 V2 35.6 D 96 NG E9 79 14 7 0.70 0.70 2.00 0.70 V0 36.3 M 98 F1 E10 79 14 7 1.50 1.50 2.00 0.70 V0 41.4 M 108 F1 CE11 79 14 7 0.05 0.05 2.00 0.70 V0 38.3 M 102 F2 CE12 79 14 7 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.70 V2 33.6 B 104 F2 CE13 79 14 7 0.00 0.70 2.00 0.70 V0 37.9 M 107 F2 CE14 79 14 7 0.00 1.50 2.00 0.70 V0 35.9 M 107 F2 CE15 79 14 7 0.70 0.00 2.00 0.70 V0 37.2 M 103 F2 CE16 79 14 7 1.50 0.00 2.00 0.70 V0 33.6 M 94 F2 E11 81 13 6.5 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 39.6 M 102 F1 E12 76 16 8 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 33.1 M 102 F1 CE17 73 18 9 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V0 33.0 M 105 F2 CE18 89 7 4 0.30 0.30 2.00 0.70 V2 39.3 B 93 NG

[0042] In Tables 1 and 2, an “F1” in the column titled “Final Grade” indicates that a V-0 grade of flame retardancy and more than 70% of the initial tensile impact strength are maintained after UV exposure testing and hydrothermal dipping testing. An “F2” indicates that a V-0 grade of flame retardancy and more than 70% of the initial tensile impact strength are maintained after UV exposure testing or hydrothermal dipping testing. A “NG” (No Grade) indicates that the grade is neither F1 nor F2. An “M” (Maintained) in the column titled “Maintenance of FR” indicates that flame retardancy is maintained after treatment, a “B” (Below) indicates a V-2 grade of flame retardancy both before and after treatment, and a “D” (Deteriorated) indicates that an initial V-0 grade of flame retardancy is reduced to V-2.

[0043] As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the polypropylene resin composition of the present invention, which includes about 40-90% by weight polypropylene resin with a melt flow rate of about 4-18 g/10 minutes, about 9-16% by weight halogen-containing flame retardant additive with a low melt point, about 4-15% by weight antimony oxide in the form of white granules, about 0.2-3.0% by weight ultraviolet stabilizer, about 0.1-5% by weight silane coupling agent, and about 0.2-5% by weight titanium dioxide, exhibits excellent weathering characteristics and maintains excellent physical/mechanical properties as well as a flame retardancy grade of V-0 grade after hydrothermal dipping testing.

[0044] As described above, the polypropylene resin composition, according to the present invention, exhibits an excellent initial flame retardancy and maintains a high flame retardancy as well as excellent physical/mechanical properties after long-term outdoor exposure and long hydrothermal treatments at a film thickness of {fraction (1/32)} inch providing a grade of F1 in the UL 746C environmental resistance test. The resin of the present invention can be used in products such as light bulb sockets for Christmas tree lights that may experience long-term outdoor exposure. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A flame retardant polypropylene resin composition comprising 40˜90% by weight of polypropylene resin with melt flow rate of 4˜18 g/10 minutes, 9˜16% by weight of flame retardant additive of halogen with low melting point, 4˜15% by weight of antimony oxide in white granules, 0.2˜3.0% by weight of ultraviolet stabilizer, 0.1˜5% by weight of silane coupling agents, and 0.2˜5% by weight of titanium dioxide.
 2. The flame retardant polypropylene resin composition according to claim 1, wherein said polypropylene resin is a polypropylene homopolymer or a crystalline polypropylene copolymer.
 3. The flame retardant polypropylene resin composition according to claim 1, wherein said flame retardant additive of halogen with low melting point is tetrabromobisphenol A bis-(dibromopropylether) or tetralromodimethysulfone dipropylether, or mixture thereof.
 4. The flame retardant polypropylene resin composition according to claim 1, wherein said antimony oxide is an antimony trioxide or antimony pentaoxide, or mixture thereof.
 5. The flame retardant polypropylene resin composition according to claim 1, wherein said ultraviolet stabilizer us a mixture of HALS ultraviolet stabilizer with molecular weight of more than 2,000 and UV absorbent.
 6. The flame retardant polypropylene resin composition according to claim 1, wherein said silane coupling agent is a vinyl trimethoxy silane, vinyl triethoxy silane, 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane, N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, 3-glycydoxypropyl trimethoxy silane, 3-chloropropyl trimethoxy silane, 3-metacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane or 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxy silane. 